This blog is NOFOLLOW Free!

Google Employees’ Guiding Principles at Work


Came across this photo from CNet News- Google employees coming up with their own guiding principles at work. Here goes:

1. There aren’t really any rules.
2. Customer Safety and Happiness is #1.
3. It’s only code–We can change it.
4. We all work for the same company.
5. Networks are infinitely configurable.
6. No “Policy” Discussions.
7. No “Working.”
8. Computers will only break your heart.

Credit: Joris Evers/CNET News.com

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Earn money with Scour!

Social Bookmarking
Add to: Yigg Add to: Digg Add to: Del.icio.us Add to: Reddit Add to: Jumptags Add to: Upchuckr Add to: Simpy Add to: StumbleUpon Add to: Slashdot Add to: Netscape Add to: Yahoo Add to: Google Add to: Blinklist Add to: Blogmarks Add to: Technorati Add to: Newsvine Add to: Blinkbits Add to: Ma.Gnolia Add to: Smarking Add to: Netvouz Information
This entry was posted on Monday, April 7th, 2008 at 9:38 pm and is filed under Google. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

You might also want to read:

  • Twitter poll election
  • How Google Handles Our Private Information
  • The Google Tablet Is Coming, Courtesy of Verizon [Android]
  • Google’s First Laser Logo Tribute
  • Test Drive Your Type With Google Font Preview
  • 2 Responses to “Google Employees’ Guiding Principles at Work”

    1. lift chairs Says:

      I have always like the Google atmosphere, but I don’t know if I agree with #3. When you consider all the credit card and other personal information that is housed at Google this ‘rule’ comes across as sort of alarming. From a security standpoint if you just write code and figure you’ll fix it as it breaks, you are doing a great disservice to everyone who uses your code. Of course this isn’t an official Google document, but it seems to represent at least some of their employees.

    2. Simon - presentation skills training UK Says:

      I take your point but I don’t think that’s what this guideline is getting at at all. I interpreted it as meaning that people weren’t to get too hung up on the “way things were” or the “way things were done”. It’s not about “we can change it if it’s wrong” it’s about “let’s change it if we can make it better”.

      S

    Leave a Reply

    Please leave these two fields as-is:

    Protected by Invisible Defender. Showed 403 to 14,155 bad guys.

    Comments links could be nofollow free.