<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Employees&#8217; Guiding Principles at Work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.blogsthatfollow.com/2008/04/google-guiding-principles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.blogsthatfollow.com/2008/04/google-guiding-principles/</link>
	<description>Official Blog of "Do Follow" Blog Directory. Blurbs on SEO, Technology, Business, Marketing, and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 21:50:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon - presentation skills training UK</title>
		<link>http://blog.blogsthatfollow.com/2008/04/google-guiding-principles/comment-page-1/#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon - presentation skills training UK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 14:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.blogsthatfollow.com/?p=84#comment-277</guid>
		<description>I take your point but I don&#039;t think that&#039;s what this guideline is getting at at all.  I interpreted it as meaning that people weren&#039;t to get too hung up on the &quot;way things were&quot; or the &quot;way things were done&quot;.  It&#039;s not about &quot;we can change it if it&#039;s wrong&quot; it&#039;s about &quot;let&#039;s change it if we can make it better&quot;.

S</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I take your point but I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s what this guideline is getting at at all.  I interpreted it as meaning that people weren&#8217;t to get too hung up on the &#8220;way things were&#8221; or the &#8220;way things were done&#8221;.  It&#8217;s not about &#8220;we can change it if it&#8217;s wrong&#8221; it&#8217;s about &#8220;let&#8217;s change it if we can make it better&#8221;.</p>
<p>S</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lift chairs</title>
		<link>http://blog.blogsthatfollow.com/2008/04/google-guiding-principles/comment-page-1/#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator>lift chairs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 20:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.blogsthatfollow.com/?p=84#comment-220</guid>
		<description>I have always like the Google atmosphere, but I don&#039;t know if I agree with #3. When you consider all the credit card and other personal information that is housed at Google this &#039;rule&#039; comes across as sort of alarming. From a security standpoint if you just write code and figure you&#039;ll fix it as it breaks, you are doing a great disservice to everyone who uses your code. Of course this isn&#039;t an official Google document, but it seems to represent at least some of their employees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have always like the Google atmosphere, but I don&#8217;t know if I agree with #3. When you consider all the credit card and other personal information that is housed at Google this &#8216;rule&#8217; comes across as sort of alarming. From a security standpoint if you just write code and figure you&#8217;ll fix it as it breaks, you are doing a great disservice to everyone who uses your code. Of course this isn&#8217;t an official Google document, but it seems to represent at least some of their employees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
