Internet law photographs
The Internet in its entirety is filled with copyright violations. There is almost no web site where at least a photograph is used without permission. What most people do not understand is, the copyright owner of the photograph has to authorize the use of the photograph. If you made the photography yourself, then the persons on the photo have to know and approve that you use their likeness on the net for whatever purpose; ideally you’d have written and signed release forms.
Celebrities get photographed every day. Their name and likeness are available to everyone unless it invades their privacy. This is the actual law regulation and it does not only apply to the use on the Net. A candid photo of a celebrity may be viewed as invasion of privacy and cost very much to settle. Many paparazzi that went too far experienced such vengeful retaliation by stars.
But private persons do not lead public lives. Any photograph of private persons requires consent, usually clearly seen on the photograph itself. But what happens if the photo was taken without your consent? Then the photographer can be barred from using the photos, furthermore he may be forced to hand over the pictures in question.
But much more often it happens that photos are being used without consent of the copyright holder and are simply posted on the web page, or forum without taking into consideration that this is actually someone’s livelihood. Someone shot a picture with the intent or maybe without intent to make money out of it. Free distribution by third persons is almost never an intention, much less someone else making money out of it. Many celebrity gossip pages learned the hard way to ask for permission to use copyrighted material before it gets posted on the Net.
But is using photographs on forums illegal? Technically if you post copyrighted material on a forum, you are breaking the law. Most of the time the owner of the copyright will not act upon it, if it’s done for private use and is not posted to make money or generate unusually high traffic. When Britney Spears got caught without her panties or the infamous head shaving photos, these pictures flooded the Web in minutes, most of them were used without permission. As fast as they were put up, they were taken down. Attorneys on retainer are slowly but surely killing this illegal picture-napping.
There are existing copyright regulations pertaining to the photographic material which are valid for hardcopy photographs as well as digital images. Use without permission is strictly prohibited.

Social Bookmarking
This entry was posted on Monday, June 22nd, 2009 at 11:12 am and is filed under internet. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
















Leave a Reply