<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Internet jurisdiction law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.blogsthatfollow.com/2009/09/internet-jurisdiction-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.blogsthatfollow.com/2009/09/internet-jurisdiction-law/</link>
	<description>Official Blog of "Do Follow" Blog Directory. Blurbs on SEO, Technology, Business, Marketing, and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 19:57:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: xmariachi</title>
		<link>http://blog.blogsthatfollow.com/2009/09/internet-jurisdiction-law/comment-page-1/#comment-6141</link>
		<dc:creator>xmariachi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.blogsthatfollow.com/1956/06/internet-jurisdiction-law/#comment-6141</guid>
		<description>Internet laws are difficult to make. It requires knowledge of a field that&#039;s ever-changing, plus judges themselves aren&#039;t up to know the tech knowledge that it takes. 

Plus, once you create a law, that&#039;s set in stone until you revoke it, so you have to measure consequences wisely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Internet laws are difficult to make. It requires knowledge of a field that&#8217;s ever-changing, plus judges themselves aren&#8217;t up to know the tech knowledge that it takes. </p>
<p>Plus, once you create a law, that&#8217;s set in stone until you revoke it, so you have to measure consequences wisely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Davies</title>
		<link>http://blog.blogsthatfollow.com/2009/09/internet-jurisdiction-law/comment-page-1/#comment-5701</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Davies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.blogsthatfollow.com/1956/06/internet-jurisdiction-law/#comment-5701</guid>
		<description>This is something that crossed my mind when looking at the new FTC rules for affiliates and giving references to other products.

All I make make out is that it sure is a huge minefield!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is something that crossed my mind when looking at the new FTC rules for affiliates and giving references to other products.</p>
<p>All I make make out is that it sure is a huge minefield!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet Marketing Consultant</title>
		<link>http://blog.blogsthatfollow.com/2009/09/internet-jurisdiction-law/comment-page-1/#comment-5509</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet Marketing Consultant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 23:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.blogsthatfollow.com/1956/06/internet-jurisdiction-law/#comment-5509</guid>
		<description>I would imagine that internet law is quite confusing, and very difficult to litigate. I am surprised there are not more internet jurisdiction laws.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would imagine that internet law is quite confusing, and very difficult to litigate. I am surprised there are not more internet jurisdiction laws.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
